Do you prefer a Van Gogh or a Keith Haring to decorate your office?

Haussmann-style or contemporary? Classic or modern decor? Ifop has studied the lives of employees in the Paris region and their artistic and architectural preferences.

And if your boss put a painting on that little piece of wall you pass in front of every day at the office, would you prefer a classic or a modern design? Monet or a Kandinsky? This strange question was put to a sample of 1,300 employees in the Paris region working for a company with more than 10 employees. The survey, conducted by the French Institute of Public Opinion (Ifop) for Société Foncière Lyonnaise, reveals whether good offices make good employees.

The 70+ page report reveals, for example, that 83% of Parisians find their colleagues “beautiful”, while 2% find them “very ugly”. But above all, Ifop notes that they are very sensitive to the “good looks” of their colleagues. decoration and thearchitecture of their offices. And let’s face it, they’ve got expensive taste…

Which picture in my office?

In the field of painting, for example, the institute has proposed several masterpieces. Between Wheat field with cypress by Vincent Van Gogh (1889), Poppies by Monet (1873), Transverse Line or Blue Painting by Vassily Kandisky (1923), Untitled (Dance) from Keith Haring (1987), from street-art or simply nothing at all, employees don’t seem to hesitate too much. 24% of those polled prefer the work of Van Gogh, closely followed by Monet (22%), although Ifop suggests it’s a painting by Manet… Long live Impressionism.

Taken separately, the two Kandiskys account for 15% and 11%, which still leaves 26% of respondents opting for one of the Russian painter’s paintings. Keith Haring’s neo-impressionist work (13%) and street-art style (9%) close the gap. A final 6% think it’s better to have a wall without a painting.

The Haussmannian, number one

And in terms of architecture? The survey compared several types of building: Haussmannian, contemporary and high-rise. The results show that the architecture imagined by Baron Haussmann at the end of the 19th century is the winner.e century. Franciliens give it an average score of 7.4 out of 10. Beige facades, with dark grey balconies and domed roofs, received the highest score of the survey, 8 out of 10. A clear-cut result, as if Parisian aesthetics were forever linked to this era and, therefore, to this architecture.

This style of Haussmann building is the preferred workplace of Parisians.
AFP/MIGUEL MEDINA

The contemporary style keeps a good distance from the Haussmann style. The buildings featured in the Ifop survey scored 6.2 out of 10, 1.2 points lower than the Haussmann style. In fact, it’s hard to imagine any of the buildings featured in the photos in a Paris arrondissement…

Only 61% of Parisians find the Burj Khalifa “beautiful”.
AFP/GIUSEPPE CACACE

La Franciliens’ relationship with towers has not always been easy. And this is confirmed by this survey. The 1,300 employees questioned had to rate and decide between the Burj Khalifa from Dubaithe heart of La Défense in Paris and New York’s World Trade Center. The average score is 6 out of 10. Only 0.2 points less than the contemporary style, but still 1.4 less than the Haussmann style. In detail, the La Défense district received the lowest score: just 5.4 out of 10. Is it because people in the Paris region see it as the “cliché look” of the workplace? In any case, neither the Burj Khalifa (828 m) nor the One World Trade Center tower (541 m) would be able to stand in the Paris skyline. Triangle Tower and its 180 m height has already caused quite a stir. Today, no serious developer in Paris would risk such an adventure. Much to the delight of a majority of employees who, if Ifop is to be believed, are very conventional in their tastes.

source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top